"Apple M1" is 17.1 Beta just before native support announcementĪpple silicon had native support in 17.1 and significant optimizations in 17.3.The top four in the graph, "Apple M1 MAX", "RTX 3060", "RTX 3050 Ti", "RTX 3070" and "Apple M1 Pro" are 17.4.The version of DaVinci Resolve has been confirmed by "The Comparison" as follows. Relationship between processing support by GPU and OS Metal is also compatible with the M1 Mac, and I think it's good to think that it has great performance, partly because of the good performance of Apple silicon. Macs do not have this limitation, so even in the so-called Intel Mac era, those with Radeon GPUs have achieved performance that exceeds NVIDIA's PCs. (Blackmagic Design's Dialogue) However, in Windows, the use of "Metal" is restricted, and as a result, NVIDIA is used as the GPU with the best performance. I will describe the story limited to DaVinci Resolve.ĭaVinci Resolve has long been optimized for the API "Metal" that can be used with AMD Radeon, and in environments where Metal can be used, it has been designed to deliver performance that exceeds NVIDIA's CUDA. The reason why the M1 Mac can process as fast as the NVIDIA RTX series DaVinci Neural Engine performance is up to 4x faster in real-time facial recognition, object detection and smart reframing! ProMotion 120Hz display support for incredibly smooth playback and editing, and the new Apple MacBook HDR display with HDR viewer support. I would like to expect a report including M1 MAX in 17.4.ĭaVinci Resolve 17.4 decodes 12K Blackmagic RAW files more than 3x faster and renders H.265 1.5x faster. The M1 Mac's cost performance shines because there are almost no Windows laptops, and even if there is, it is expensive.ĭaVinci Resolve 17.4 has been optimized for M1 Mac as follows. Anything comparable to this on a Windows laptop will be pretty expensive.Īs mentioned in the official consideration, for Windows, "NVIDIA GPU with VRAM 8GB or more", "If you want to use H.264, it is important to use the paid version", and "NVIDIA GPU with VRAM 8GB or more". It is very surprising that such performance is realized in a notebook PC. RTX 3060/3070 At least the same level as a Windows desktop PC with a mid-range to high-end graphic board, Is well beyond the performance of GPUs purchased by the general public. M1 Pro it is close to the RTX3060 as a performance GPU close to high-end gaming notebook PCs. The same level of performance as a Windows desktop PC equipped with a middle-range graphic board can be specified.Īs a GPU, it is about the GTX1080 released in 2015, but it has sufficient performance.įrom the Windows desktop PC equipped with the Of course, what about when you're comparing laptops? I am aware that there is an opinion thatĬost performance is very good compared to Windows laptops that can edit videos. I think there may be some objections when I summarize the current information safely, but I think that it is generally as follows. Since the OS is different and sufficient verification has not been done, I am worried about whether the current information can be used only as a cormorant. I will write the conclusion, but first excuse me. Without more detailed information, it is difficult to make a definite evaluation, but it seems safe to say that the RTX3060 has exceeded it. This is the conclusion on using DaVinci Resolve.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |